Ricci v. DeStefano Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Ricci v. DeStefano - Essay Exampledisparate impact in relation to Title sevensome of the Civil Rights turning, arguments that urge courts to be colorize blind in their deliberations, and the concept of narrowly accommodate court-ordered remedies for discrimination.Disparate impact can be defined as a theory used to prove discrimination in employment. It forbids employers from using certain employment practices that are non-discriminatory in their intentions, but can still disproportionately affect people belonging to certain groups with regards to race, age, sex, ethnicity or disability. Fish, (2009) argues that although the law considers the use of tests to evaluate job applicants a useful measure, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does not allow use of tests solely to promote stokers unless it relates to job performance. For instance, the test used by the city of New Haven, did not test a firefighters ability to lead or supervise others in the line of duty hence, caused a disp arate impact.Color blind refers to making judicial decisions without regards to race. concord to Fish (2009), the race of the federal judges is likely to affect the result of cases especially in issues relating to racial harassment in the workplace. Thus, the courts are urged to be color blind in order to have an efficient judicial decision making process that does not discriminate individuals based on race.Narrowly tailored refers to drafting something in order to meet the needs of a certain party. In this case, narrowly tailored refers to the ability of the court to draft certain concepts in the case in order to provide a solution to discrimination. For instance, the court rejected New Havens reasoning claiming that the fear of legal carry through cannot be used as an excuse by an employers dependence on race to the disadvantage of other firefighters who performed well in the test and sufficient to be promoted (Fish, 2009). This court decision goes against Title VII of the Civi l Rights Act